thozhanias@gmail.com

 


National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India

1. Introduction

  • The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is
    an independent statutory body established in 1993 under
    the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993.
  • Mandate: Protecting and promoting human rights in
    India, including rights to life, liberty, equality, and dignity.
  • Functions as a watchdog, ensuring
    constitutional and international human rights standards are upheld.

2. Objectives

  • Strengthen institutional frameworks for addressing
    human rights violations.
  • Investigate allegations of excesses or negligence by
    public authorities.
  • Promote human rights awareness, reform, and
    preventive measures.
  • Complement existing efforts to safeguard rights of
    marginalized groups.

3. Composition

Full-time Members:

Chairperson: Retired Chief Justice of
India or Supreme Court judge.

Members:
Sitting/retired Supreme Court judge.
Sitting/retired Chief Justice of High Court.
Three individuals with knowledge/practical
experience in human rights (at least one woman).

Ex-officio Members (7): Chairpersons of
national commissions for:

  • Minorities
  • SCs
  • STs
  • Women
  • Backward Classes
  • Child Rights
  • Disabilities

4. Appointment

  • Appointed by: President of India on
    recommendation of a six-member committee:
    • Prime Minister (Chair)
    • Speaker of Lok Sabha
    • Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha
    • Leaders of Opposition in both Houses
    • Union Home Minister
  • Consultation with Chief Justice of India required
    for judicial members.

5. Tenure and
Service Conditions

  • Term: 3 years or until age 70,
    whichever is earlier.
  • Eligible for reappointment.
  • Cannot seek government employment after term ends.
  • Salaries and allowances fixed by government; cannot
    be reduced post-appointment.

6. Removal

  • By President on grounds such as:
    • Insolvency
    • Engaging in paid employment outside duties
    • Physical/mental incapacity
    • Conviction for a crime
    • Misbehaviour (inquiry by Supreme Court required)

7. Powers and
Functions

Functions:

  1. Inquire into human rights violations or negligence
    by public servants (suo motu, petition, or court reference).
  2. Intervene in court proceedings involving human
    rights violations.
  3. Visit prisons/detention centres and recommend
    improvements.
  4. Review legal and constitutional safeguards for human
    rights.
  5. Analyze factors like terrorism impeding rights and
    recommend measures.
  6. Study treaties/international instruments and suggest
    implementation strategies.
  7. Promote human rights literacy and awareness.
  8. Support NGOs in human rights activities.
  9. Any other function necessary to promote human
    rights.

Powers:

  • Regulate own procedures; possess powers of a civil
    court.
  • Call for reports/information from Central/State
    governments and authorities.
  • Recommend compensation, legal action, or
    interim relief.
  • Approach Supreme Court or High Courts for
    directions/orders.
  • Cannot inquire after 1 year of the
    violation.

NHRC & Armed Forces:

  • Can request reports from the central government.
  • Recommendations must be acted upon within 3
    months.
  • Reports and government actions are published and
    shared with petitioner.

8. Performance

  • Addressed issues like:
    • Abolition of bonded and child labour
    • Rights of disabled and HIV-affected persons
    • Custodial deaths, torture, and rape
  • Promotes awareness and ensures compliance with human
    rights standards.

9. Challenges

  1. Delayed appointments affecting effectiveness.
  2. Non-binding recommendations → cannot enforce
    compliance.
  3. Limited investigative authority; relies on
    state/central agencies.
  4. Cannot punish violators directly.
  5. One-year time limit excludes historical cases.
  6. Resource constraints → limited staff and
    budget.
  7. Perceived lack of independence; political influence
    concerns.
  8. Reactive approach rather than preventive measures.
  9. GANHRI accreditation deferred due to
    transparency and diversity issues.

10. Way Forward

  • Grant enforcement powers to NHRC to improve
    accountability.
  • Expand investigative authority, including armed
    forces and non-state actors.
  • Time-bound investigations for swift justice.
  • Increase financial autonomy via independent
    budget.
  • Diversify composition: include civil society and
    human rights experts.
  • Capacity building: training for members and staff.
  • Institutional accountability: regular monitoring and
    evaluation of performance.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *